
Originally Posted by
Celtaur
The first I think is mundane, a guess with a high probability because of repeating patterns. A person can be seen to likely do something because of where they are in their emotional development, and based on that their likely choices will cause them to create their experience.
The second being of a completely different level, and would be based on no knowledge of the persons past, their patterns of living, choices, etc. This would be a prophetic vision, like that of an oracle such as the Oracle of Delphi. This would be considered coming from a spiritual realm of seeing the future.
In Divinations such as the Tarot the second is where I see the messages coming from - the spiritual realm, the seer on the other side. I think that the first (the mundane) is not authentic in terms of divination, it's more about psychology rather than divination (connecting to the Divine). In essence a psychologist could do such "predictions" without the use of any cards or oracles, based on knowledge of patterns of human behaviour .
If the reader is too aware of someone's personality, history, etc., and they are the type of reader that will play on those facts, rather than allowing the message to be channeled clearly, then it is like a filter, and much of the Divine message (the intention of the message the cards are displaying) could be lost.
Bookmarks