Archons video and aliens, yaweh is evil, transhumanism

[brifae]

[brifae]

[brifae]

[Celtaur]

It's interesting that post 2 video 3, the guy talks about the archons being a glitch in the system/matrix. Earlier today I was reading something that made me think about how beliefs are like a virus that spreads through consciousness. They can be highly difficult to remove. Once someone has a belief, they not only are under it's control and often can not shake it, but they also attempt to spread it to others.

I'd like to learn more about the Gnostics.

[Celtaur]

I liked this video. I haven't had a chance to watch the longer ones though.

from the end...

"They don't want us to look inwards to our potential because when we look inwards we are going to understand that we are all powerful creatures that can create our own realities that does not include them. We have love, compassion, they don’t. What they’ve done is they’ve turned us into evil, self absorbed, ego maniacs. They’ve exploited all our weaknesses. “Hey you want sex? Focus on it night and day. Don't ever sit in a room and think about ‘who am I?’, ‘What am I here for?’. No, No, No… Sex! McDonalds! Churches! Politics! Republicans! Democrats! Get absorbed with the World!” Unabsorb yourself from the world, that’s the answer, and realize the dynamic spirit of the human being. We can rise above all this, but we’re taught, “oh, no. No. No. The Illuminati are All Powerful.” No it’s the reverse. The Illuminati have us convinced that they are giants, and there’s no way we can go against them. Not in a million years… That’s the biggest lie there is. “Oh but that’s blasphemy!” and they have all these little clichés they can throw out at you. “Oh you’re going to burn in hell for that thinking.” They don’t like a free-thinking society. They don’t like us remembering who we are as all powerful spirit creatures in flesh that can make a reality, and can create a reality, that does not include them.

[brifae]

[brifae]

[brifae]

At 46:00
Beware of the god of the jews/hebrews/islamics, of the christians, jehovah or yaweh of the OT a demented alien being who is false and claims to be the true creator who inhabits our solar system yaldaboath who works against humanity as the head of the archons, satan is a fictional story.
They beleive the snake and earth is sophia the goddess creator, the kundalini, this info is why they tried to kill off the gnostics and their exposee.....

Note: I do not agree with everything in the video regarding aliens, and also kundalini

[brifae]

according to satanists and jehovah's witnesses and the bible, yaweh killed around 2 million people....satan... about 10 people total....... of job's first children which was a parable and yaweh was also to blame, so satanists say satan killed 2 people.
It is listed in the website below the verses in which yaweh killed people:

http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watc...e-God-vs-Satan

Judeochristianity has become polluted reversed qaballah: the tree of death qlippoth instead of the otz chim tree of life in the qlippothian saturnian religions death cults.
Titles and names:
the demonic opposite of Kether is duality instead of unity and are Satan and Moloch or Malech (king)
Lord=adonai=ba'al=master=molech...Ba'al a word which means Lord, much as Adonai means Lord
see wikipedia qlippoth
The meaning of "lord" as a member of royalty or nobility is more accurately translated as Adon in Semitic.
... honorific meaning "master" or "lord" referring to Hadad... god of the rain, thunder, fertility and agriculture, and the lord of Heaven.
more or less identical with the god El (jupiter,zeus,god), who was also generally identified with Cronus and Saturn. However, Yigael Yadin thought him to be a moon god....or bull...."Lord of Two Horns'"identifies him with the god Dagon
see wikipedia Ba'al
1 Chronicles 9:40. 1 Chronicles 12:5 mentions the name Beʿaliah (more accurately be‘alyâ) meaning "Yahweh is Baʿal."
embodiments of 'Ashtart. Baʿal Hadad is associated with the goddess "Virgin" Anat, his sister and lover.
There were multiple ba'al's or lords..ba'al zebub....bezelbub lord of flies...(derogratory of poo)

Molech n. (Script.) The fire god of the Ammonites, to whom human sacrifices were offered; Moloch.

God sometimes ordered and other times accepted human sacrifice. Many people, especially first born sons, were only saved by the substitution sacrifices of additional livestock..or marked as not be be sacrificed by circumscision as tribute.
Yahweh's chosen are not to come too close to the divine presence to protect the people from his tendency to kill without warning, for example Exodus 19:21.
There is the cruel command god gave to Abram (Honored Father) to sacrifice his favored child Isaac (Laughter). (Genesis 22:1 to 13) Though god eventually changes his mind, the text treats this as a reasonable divine request.

http://www.angelfire.com/ga/ursamajor/sacrifice.html

In Exodus 22:29-30 we read:

“You shall not delay to offer from the fullness of your harvest and from the outflow of your presses. The first-born of your sons you shall give to me. You shall do likewise with your oxen and with your sheep: seven days it shall be with its dam; on the eighth day you shall give it to me.”

Later on God admitted he did this in Ezekiel 20:25-26 where he purportedly said: “Moreover I gave them statutes that were not good and ordinances by which they could not have life; and I defiled them through their very gifts in making them offer by fire all their first-born, that I might horrify them; I did it that they might know that I am the LORD.”

Child sacrifice was probably only considered evil when it was done in the name of a foreign god, and doing so was punishable by death precisely because it was offered to another deity. Child sacrifice was something that several Biblical people either did, or assisted others in doing so. Abraham was not morally repulsed by the command itself and there is no command against this practice there by God (Genesis 22). Then there is Jepthah who sacrificed his daughter because of a stupid vow (Judges 11); David (II Sam. 21:7-9); Solomon and his wives (I Kings 3:16); Ahab (I Kings 16:33-34); Ahaz (II Kings 16:2-3); Hoshea (II Kings 17:7); and Manasseh (II Kings 21:6; II Chronicles 33:6). It was a problem for King Josiah (II King 23:10), for Jeremiah (Jeremiah 7:30-31; 19:3-5; 32:35), and Ezekiel (Ezekiel 16:20-21; 20:25-26, 30-31). The prophet Micah wonders if he should sacrifice his oldest son “as a sin offering” (6:6-8).
In the New Testament God the Father sacrifices his only son (Jesus) as the central redemptive act of Christianity, and God still seeks to fulfill his lust for human sacrifice by burning humans forever in the lake of fire.

He killed masses of children in the Flood (and so how is "sacrificing" children to him ethically different" for him"?
He ordered Abraham to sacrifice his son. Abraham thought at least this was a possible legitimate request.
He killed the first-born of Egypt.That probably amounted to thousands right there.
He ordered the killing of the Amalekite children as punishment. These are seen as part of a sacrificial ritual of HEREM.
He killed the child of David as punishment for what David did in 2 Samuel 12:14.

http://debunkingchristianity.blogspo...sacrifice.html

[Celtaur]

in discussing the word "Lord", I was thinking about that yesterday as I pondered how religion reflects humanities hierarchy of authority. Lord has long been used to refer to someone above you, "My Lord" as has been often spoken of royalty, kings, etc., of higher rank. We also have the ruler of authority, the Judge on the throne, in the court system, which judges those below him in rank... the everyday citizen. So religion, is very reflective of man's political system, and this can be seen of course in the Olympians of Greek Mythology, where it seems much of our Western culture's ideologies about God, Heaven and Hell have strong ties. The JudeoChristian system of duality certainly hearkens to the Zeus (authority in the highest rank / Heaven), Hades (Hell, Underworld) relationship, or Zeus, Cronus (Saturn/Satan), of course.

I would certainly agree that the system of our most popular western religion certainly focuses much on duality rather than unity, whereas unity is only accorded to those of like mind in the "with us, or against us" mentality, and thus is not really unity at all, but the ego's side of the duality focus.